Who is antonin scalia

Schultz, David A. Lanham, Md. Smith, Christopher E. Westport, Conn. Staab, James. Hudson, David L. Hudson Jr. Antonin Scalia [electronic resource].

Other articles in Judges and Justices. Want to support the Free Speech Center? Donate Now. Glen Theatre, Inc. Jones California Democratic Party v. Jones Citizens United v. Smith Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v.

Weisman McConnell v. Johnson United States v. Scalia graduated first in his class and summa cum laude with a B. While at Georgetown, he also studied at the University of Fribourg, Switzerland. Scalia went on to study law at Harvard, where he was a notes editor for the Harvard Law Review. He graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law with an LL. The fellowship allowed him to travel throughout Europe during and Scalia was considered to be a core member of the conservative wing of the court.

He was a vigorous proponent of textualism in statutory interpretation, an originalist in constitutional interpretation and a passionate critic of the idea of a " Living Constitution. Judge Richard Posner disagreed with Scalia's strict practice of textualism and originalism. Posner used an anecdote to point out what he perceived as the flaw of strict textualism:.

Scalia's coauthor Bryan A. Garner, in response to Posner's critique, wrote that Posner misrepresented their position:. Scalia's Martin-Quinn score following the term was 1. Martin-Quinn scores were developed by political scientists Andrew Martin and Kevin Quinn from the University of Michigan, and measure the justices of the Supreme Court along an ideological continuum. The chart below details every justice's Martin-Quinn score for the term.

In the swearing-in ceremony Reagan said that Scalia was a "brilliant judge" and referred to his previous legal experience: "He had a distinguished career as a lawyer and as a professor of law before joining the Court of Appeals nearly 4 years ago. There he became known for his integrity and independence and for the force of his intellect. Scalia's nomination was reported to the full Senate on August 4, , and he was confirmed on August 5, Scalia left the court when he was elevated to the Supreme Court of the United States on September 17, In the term, Scalia was in the majority in 83 percent of decisions.

He was in the majority more often than one other justice, the same as one, and less often than six other justices. In the term, Scalia was in the majority in 69 percent of decisions. He was in the majority more often than one other justice and less often than seven other justices. Since the term, Scalia has been in the majority more than 80 percent of the time three times. The noteworthy cases listed in this section include any case where the justice authored a majority opinion or an dissent.

Other cases may be included in this decision if they set or overturn an established legal precedent, are a major point of discussion in an election campaign, receive substantial media attention related to the justice's ruling, or based on our editorial judgment that the case is noteworthy. For more on how we decide which cases are noteworthy, click here. Justice Scalia was the writer of the majority opinion in the case of Danny Lee Kyllo v.

William Elliot, an agent of the United States Department of the Interior, used thermal imaging on Danny Kyllo's residence to determine if extra heat, that could imply the use of growing lamps, was coming from the house.

Scalia wrote in his opinion that since thermal imaging isn't a commonly used technology it is bound by the Fourth Amendment. Scalia on the precedent:. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a concurring in part and dissenting in part opinion for the case of Arizona v. The case involved the Arizona law that allowed officers to require anyone who was under arrest to present documentation to prove they were legal citizens.

The law also allowed authorities to detain anyone they believed to be in the United States illegally without a warrant. The Court found that Arizona law preempted current federal laws in all cases except for the requirement of arrested people to present proof of citizenship. Scalia wrote that the assumption that the Arizona law contradicts federal law is false, and in actuality the Arizona law is in accordance with it.

He said that the law seeks to enforce current federal law within Arizona's rights as a sovereign state. Justice Scalia went on to argue that the opinion writer's assumption that the Arizona law contradicts federal law is false, and in actuality the Arizona law is in accordance with it. He comments that the law seeks to enforce current federal law within Arizona's rights as a sovereign state. First, before his appointment to the High Court, appellate attorneys were generally accustomed to reading from prepared remarks without facing many demanding questions from the bench.

Second, both from the bench and in his written opinions, Justice Scalia worked tirelessly to refine and advance the fundamental legal concept of originalism, through which he sought to have judges interpret the Constitution based upon how closely the arguments in the case aligned with its language, history, and original intent. His originalist judicial philosophy led him on occasion to rule in opposition to his own personal tastes and religious faith.